🔗 Share this article

The recent US national security strategy presents a flawed assessment of Europe. It claims that open-border policies and what it terms "woke" agendas represent an existential threat to the continent's identity. Yet, this argument rests on a fundamental misreading of the reality. The true danger confronting the EU is not societal but economic and technological lag.

The Stark Growth Gap Separating Europe and the US

The data reveal a stark picture. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by eighty-seven percent, while a paltry 13.5% growth for the EU. Over this time, European income per person fell from 76.5% to just 50% of the US level. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a higher per capita income than several leading EU nations like France and Italy.

Today, about 50% of the world’s 50 largest tech companies are American, while only four are European.

The Technological Deficit: A Critical Question

This widening disparity stems from superior productivity growth in the US, largely due to breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of global tech leadership is decidedly US-centric. Over the past fifty years, 241 US firms have grown into companies valued at over $10bn, compared with just 14 in the European continent.

This disparity raises a vital issue: As the competition for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, what is the EU stand? Experts widely agree it is essentially a contest between two involving the US and China, with Europe entering at a significant handicap.

Underlying Factors of Europe's Technological Lag

A number of key factors explain this innovation chasm.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a much more robust and agile system for funding startups. The EU has yet to establish a genuine capital markets union, which limits the scale of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented regulation hinder Europe. A US startup can launch a product under one regulatory framework to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The EU, despite a larger population size, is split among 27 separate systems, creating huge internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was historically met with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a tightly woven academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's long-term lack of spending in defense has weakened its ability in pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

Despite these hurdles, one can find reasons for optimism. European leaders are increasingly aware of the existential challenge and have started to advance substantial change. Key reports on EU competitiveness and the single market highlight the need for sweeping changes.

Given appropriate incentives and rule changes, Europe's strengths might enable much higher levels of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe still possesses significant strengths: high-quality human capital, excellent schools and universities, and premier research institutions. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these foundations could trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Crucially, even if Europe does not take the lead in creating next-generation tech, it can still significantly increase economic output by implementing and tailoring advancements from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

Europe now faces a decisive crossroads. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, the continent's slide in innovation has been steady. However, if it fails to take bold steps to tackle its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could give way to a rapid and permanent decline in global economic relevance.